For example, even tho D. Rose is obviously

I feel as with current games the ratings are inflated because a lot of current players grew up enjoying live/2K and having a low rating has a stigma to it. No one would like to be a player that is good and NBA 2K MT a 69. So I have been thinking for nba 2K21 if it came out now, what would a fairer evaluation system look like? It broke down to these categories. That said, here is my take for the 2020 nba starters and a bench and role players to each NBA team. I did all of the starters and up into the guy if I knew the team well enough. This listing doesn’t account so a few of the starting lineups I had to mess with what I thought was the ideal fit for the team.

For example, even tho D. Rose is obviously the best suited for the beginning PG function, I believe its safe to state with his prior injury history that he should come off the seat. I tried applying that for the majority of the teams that have severe injuries to their own player (i.e. Brookyln Nets). These evaluations also don’t account for players who are injured and what their upcoming general may be after they come back from their injury, how well they have been playing before their harm (John Wall, KD, Klay, for example). So again, take this with a grain of salt. I tried my very best sticking to the rules I put above.

The issue with their profession system is chiefly due to Buy NBA 2K Coins potential. They need to find a way to make it based on performance or something. They provide almost every young player a possible rating that they ultimately achieve.

Add Comment
0 Answer(s)

Your Answer

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.